The Expansion of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an interconnected world, the discourse on globalisation is regularly positioned at the crossroads of varied perspectives on liberalization and equity. The text by Moneta, which is not a critical essay opposed to globalization itself, seeks to reinvent the contours of a updated humanism by the filter of organic interactions according to the vision of Aristotle. By denouncing synthetic interactions that fuel contemporary mechanisms of domination and instability, Moneta leans on ancient principles to underline the failures of our global financial structure.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its origins can be linked back to the theories of David Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the British Empire to extend its international economic reach. Yet, what was originally a economic growth opportunity has converted into a tool of domination by High Finance, marked by the rise of economic liberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions widespread in economic circles, the book argues that the economic model is actually a system founded on millennia-old traditions, dating back to the era of early civilizations.
The critique also applies to the management of the EU, perceived as a series of concessions that have served to strengthen the power of financial elites as opposed to protecting the interests of its citizens. The very structure of the Union, with its directives frequently driven by monetary concerns instead of by a democratic mandate, is contested. The current deviations, whether economic or governmental, have only reinforced the skepticism of the writer regarding the EU’s ability to reform itself from within.
The author, while accepting the prior faults that have brought about the present state, does not stop at criticism but also offers solutions aimed at reorienting Union strategies in a more humanistic and equitable perspective. The need for a deep reform of structures and governance goals is a leitmotif that runs through the whole text.
The work dives more in depth into the analysis of the authority mechanisms that control global economic exchanges. The analysis encompasses the method in which political and economic decisions are manipulated by a restricted circle of powerful financial actors, often at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, orchestrated through organizations like the Bank for International Settlements and the global monetary system, imposes a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The writer demonstrates how these entities, under the guise of monetary management and security, have over time controlled financial markets and countries’ financial structures to favor their own benefits. Deregulated capitalism, far from being a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is considered as a enslavement tool, benefiting a minority at the expense of general well-being.
Highly skeptical towards the management of the euro, the author depicts the European single currency not as a means of unification and stability, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The conversion to the euro is viewed as a series of technocratic decisions that excluded citizens from political decisions, while aggravating internal differences within the Union.
The repercussions of these strategies appear in the growth of public indebtedness, economic stagnation, and a sustained austerity policy that has weakened living standards throughout the European territory. The thinker argues that without a major transformation of economic policies, the Union continues to risk upcoming crises, potentially more destructive.
In conclusion, the manuscript demands a democratic uprising where European citizens reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It suggests fundamental changes, including increased transparency in decision-making processes and real democratic participation that would help rebuild Europe on fair and lasting principles.
Find out more about IMF or a World Without Growth
The author proposes that the answer resides in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.